Skip to main content

Aspen Institute Logo

  • Publications »
  • Conference Centers »
  • Press Center »
  • Support Us »
  • Society of Fellows »
  • About the Institute
  • Events
  • Our Policy Work
  • Leadership Programs
  • Seminars
  • Our People
  • Multimedia
Explore This Program

View all programs

A

Advocacy Planning and Evaluation Program »
Agent Orange in Vietnam Program »
Ascend »
Aspen Global Health and Development »
Aspen Institute Arts Program »
Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs »
Aspen Strategy Group »
Aspen Writers' Foundation »

B

Business and Society Program »

C

Center for Native American Youth »
College Excellence Program »
Commission to Reform the Federal Appointments Process »
Communications and Society Program »
Community Strategies Group »
Congressional Program »
Council of Women World Leaders »

E

Economic Opportunities Program »
Education and Society Program »
Energy and Environment Program »

G

Global Initiative on Culture and Society »

H

Health, Biomedical Science and Society Initiative »
Homeland Security Program »

I

Initiative on Financial Security »
Initiative on Global Food Security »

J

Justice and Society Program »

M

Manufacturing and Society in the 21st Century »
Market Building Initiative »
Middle East Programs »

P

Partners for a New Beginning »
Program on Philanthropy and Social Innovation (PSI) »
Program on the World Economy »

R

Roundtable on Community Change »

S

Sports and Society Program »

Aspen Prize

  • Program Home »
  • Aspen Prize 2013 »
    • Round I »
      • Round One Model »
      • Eligible Community Colleges »
      • Apply here! »
    • Round II »
    • Round III »
    • Statements of Support »
  • Aspen Prize 2011 »
  • Decision Makers »
  • College Excellence Blog »
  • FAQ »
  • Keep Me Informed »

Tools

  • Email this Page
  • Print this Page

Share

College Excellence Program

Round I Model

As part of Round I of the Aspen Prize selection process, the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), in consultation with the Prize’s Data and Metrics Advisory Panel, developed a model for selecting 120 public two-year institutions (out of 1,008 potential candidates) eligible to apply to the Round 2 selection process.  The model was developed using publicly available data from the National Center for Education Statistics’ Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) and the U.S. Census Bureau. This document provides the details of the analytic model developed to determine the top 120 institutions. Specific calculations for each of the metrics in the model are available in the appendix.

The model is based on institutional performance in three general areas: (1) retention and completion, (2) improvement in performance over time, and (3) equity, defined as performance outcomes for underrepresented minorities and institutions in low-income service areas.  Each of these general categories was equally weighted, with each accounting for one-third of the overall score.  Adjustments to the measures were made in the analytic model (where possible) to control for institutions with unusual percentages of part-time and underrepresented minority student enrollment in order not to penalize institutions that serve disproportionately large populations of these students. Also, greater weight for overall performance was applied instead of improvement for institutions that did not improve on the performance metrics analyzed. Finally, in order to produce a representative set of institutions with respect to mission and size, the top overall performers were selected within each quartile of “percent vocational/technical credentials awarded” and “unduplicated annual enrollment.”  Additionally, to ensure that there was not disproportionate representation of institutions from certain states, no more than half of the institutions in each state were included in the top 120. 

Please click here to read the full description of the model.

  • Find Us On Facebook »
  • Contact »
  • Multimedia »
  • Privacy Policy »
  • Get the Latest Updates »

© 2012 Aspen Institute