Contact: Catherine Sullivan
212.614.4186 | [email protected]
Forty-Five Million Americans Say They Have Worked in the On-Demand Economy, While 86.5 Million Have Used It,
According to New Survey
Young, Diverse, Upbeat Workforce Values the On-Demand Economy for Flexibility, Independence, and Extra Income, While Expressing Concerns About Benefits and Safety Net, According to Major New Survey Results from Burson-Marsteller, The Aspen Institute Future of Work Initiative and TIME, Conducted by Penn Schoen Berland
Las Vegas, Nevada, January 6, 2016 — Forty-five million Americans, or 22 percent of the adult population, say they have worked or offered services in the On-Demand Economy, while 86.5 million, or 42 percent of the adult population, have used at least one On-Demand Economy service, according to a major national survey developed jointly by Burson-Marsteller, a global strategic communications and public relations firm; The Aspen Institute’s Future of Work Initiative; and TIME. The survey was conducted by research firm Penn Schoen Berland.
For purposes of the survey, participants in the On-Demand Economy, which is often called the Sharing Economy, are defined as having offered or purchased at least one of the following: Ride sharing, accommodation sharing, task services, short-term car rental or food/goods delivery. Penn Schoen Berland conducted 3,000 nationally representative online interviews among the general population across the United States from November 16-25, 2015.
The survey – the most in-depth opinion research study of workers and users of the On-Demand Economy ever conducted – is being released at CES 2016 in Las Vegas.
The survey is also featured in the new issue of TIME, hitting newsstands on Friday, and now on Time.com. Read the story by TIME San Francisco Bureau Chief Katy Steinmetz here.
- 51 percent of those who offer services in the On-Demand Economy (offerors) say their financial situation has improved over the past year, compared to 34 percent of the general population; 64 percent of offerors also expect their financial situations to improve in the next year, compared to 47 percent of the general population;
- 55 percent of offerors are members of a racial or ethnic minority, compared to 34 percent of those who have not offered on-demand services; 51 percent of offerors are under 35, compared to 31 percent of the general population;
- 71 percent of offerors say working in the industry has been a positive experience; their main motivations include extra income (33 percent), a need for additional income (26 percent), flexibility (25 percent) and independence (25 percent).
While On-Demand Economy offerors express optimism about their economic lives, the survey did uncover concerns, including:
- 72 percent of workers say they should be given more benefits as part of their job;
- 68 percent of workers say industry workers lack the financial safety net that other workers have.
Offerors are split over the tradeoffs between independence and job security: Forty-three percent say they prefer the independence of the On-Demand Economy even though it may not have the same job security or access to benefits, while 41 percent say they prefer the security and benefits of working for a traditional company even if it might mean less flexibility. A narrow plurality of offerors (49 percent) say the On-Demand economy should not be regulated and companies should compete to offer workers fair pay and benefits, even if it means less security, compared to 40 percent who say the government should regulate the sharing economy to guarantee independent contractors the same benefits afforded to full-time workers, even if it means fewer jobs.
“This new survey is the most in-depth study of workers and users of the On-Demand Economy ever conducted,” said Donald A. Baer, Worldwide Chair and CEO, Burson-Marsteller. “With nearly a quarter of Americans already working in the On-Demand Economy, and more than a third buying its services, it is clear the sector is playing a major role in the growth and direction of the United States.”
While most offerors engage in the On-Demand Economy on a casual basis, one in three offerors (14.4 million Americans) relies more heavily on this economy for income. Thirty-two percent of all offerors agreed with one or more of the following statements: They earn at least 40 percent of their income from the On-Demand Economy, the On-Demand Economy is their primary source of income or they cannot find work at a more traditional company.
Among the survey’s other findings:
- USERS EXPRESS POSITIVE EXPERIENCES, DRIVEN BY FINANCIAL REASONS: Seventy-five percent of Americans who have used one of the On-Demand Economy services report a positive experience, and merely one percent say their experience has been mostly negative. Eighty percent of users say that the industry saves them money and 79 percent believe the industry gives people greater access to things and experiences they would not be able to afford otherwise.
- OFFERORS SPEND CONSIDERABLE TIME ONLINE, BUT ARE EQUALLY LIKELY TO HAVE PRIVACY CONCERNS: Offerors consider themselves tech savvy (73 percent), yet while 79 percent report using social media apps to stay connected to friends and family, three out of four (77 percent) respondents report having concerns about their privacy.
- OFFERORS THINK COMPANIES HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO A SOCIAL CONTRACT: In addition to believing they deserve benefits, 62 percent of offerors say employers have an obligation to provide workplace education and training, and 62 percent believe that On-Demand Economy companies should reimburse their workers for some job-related expenses. Yet while most offerors in the On-Demand Economy think the industry should do more for them, 49 percent oppose government regulations requiring the industry to provide the same benefits as full-time workers if it comes at the expense of job security; 40 percent favor government regulation.
Senator Mark Warner of Virginia and Purdue President Mitch Daniels, former Governor of Indiana, serve as honorary co-chairs of the Aspen Institute’s new Future of Work Initiative – a year-long nonpartisan effort to identify concrete ways to strengthen the social contract in the midst of sweeping changes in the 21st-century workplace and workforce.
“The last official government survey of the contingent workforce was a decade ago, long before the app-driven, On-Demand Economy had blossomed,” said Daniels. “So, not unusually, Washington is far behind the times in understanding even how many workers and consumers we are talking about, let alone their interests, needs and concerns.”
“Millions of Americans are turning to the On-Demand Economy for greater flexibility and income, but still worry about their financial security,” said Senator Warner. “As more Americans earn their income from more than one employer, we need a 21st-century social contract that meets their needs.”
From November 16–25, 2015, Penn Schoen Berland conducted 3,000 online interviews with American adults on their opinions on The On-Demand Economy. The survey sample is representative of the U.S. population, with demographics matched to U.S. Census. Margin of error for the total general population sample is ±1.79% and larger for sub-groups.
Survey results were used to calculate the total number of Americans having participated, used, and/or offered on-demand economy services. The estimated share of Americans without access to the Internet, which is necessary for on-demand participation, was taken into account when calculating the total participation, usage and offering numbers.
Burson-Marsteller, established in 1953, is a leading global strategic communications and public relations firm. It provides clients with strategic thinking and program execution across a full range of public relations, public affairs, reputation and crisis management, advertising and digital strategies. The firm’s seamless worldwide network consists of 73 offices and 85 affiliate offices, together operating in 110 countries across six continents. Burson-Marsteller is a part of Young & Rubicam Group, a subsidiary of WPP (NASDAQ: WPPGY), the world’s leader in communications services. For more information, please visit www.burson-marsteller.com.
About The Aspen Institute
The Aspen Institute is an educational and policy studies organization based in Washington, DC. Its mission is to foster leadership based on enduring values and to provide a nonpartisan venue for dealing with critical issues. The Institute is based in Washington, DC; Aspen, Colorado; and on the Wye River on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. It also has offices in New York City and an international network of partners. For more information, visit www.aspeninstitute.org.
About Time Inc.
Time Inc. (NYSE:TIME) is one of the world’s leading media companies, with a monthly global print audience of over 120 million and worldwide digital properties that attract more than 140 million visitors each month, including over 60 websites. Our influential brands include People, Sports Illustrated, InStyle, Time, Real Simple, and Southern Living, as well as more than 50 diverse titles in the United Kingdom.
About Penn Schoen Berland
Penn Schoen Berland (PSB), a member of Young & Rubicam Group and the WPP Group, is a global research-based consultancy specializing in messaging and communications strategy for blue-chip corporate, political and entertainment clients. PSB’s operations include over 200 consultants and a sophisticated in-house market research infrastructure with the capability to conduct work in more than 90 countries. The company operates offices around the world, including in Washington D.C., New York, Seattle, Los Angeles, Denver, London, Hamburg, Madrid and Dubai, which are supported by in-house field capabilities and fully equipped to provide the complete creative solutions PSB clients need. For more information, please visit www.psbresearch.com.