Aspen is a place for leaders to lift their sights above the possessions which possess them. To confront their own nature as human beings, to regain control over their own humanity by becoming more self-aware, more self-correcting, and hence more self-fulfilling.
Asset ownership is a key milestone on the path to long-term financial well-being, yet many American households have been locked out of traditional ownership opportunities such as real estate. As a result, the lower half of the wealth distribution owns just 3 percent of the nation’s total wealth. To flip this script, we need innovative ownership models that can provide all Americans with an on-ramp to wealth building. One emerging strategy in this space is inclusively owned commercial real estate (CRE), which opens commercial asset ownership to low- to middle-income investors.
Investing in Inclusively Owned Commercial Real Estate examines the potential of inclusively owned CRE to propel equitable economic development and community wealth-building. Informed by the insights of investors and Aspen FSP’s Wealth Innovation cohort, it highlights lessons from several pilot programs across the country. In each case, shared ownership of commercial properties has offered a win-win-win scenario for real estate developers, local residents, and large investors. A companion set of four case studies digs into the distinct models of four organizations—Chicago TREND, Community Investment Trust, LocalCode Kansas City and LocalCode, and Partners in Equity—highlighting opportunities for replication across the U.S. Building off of Aspen FSP’s The New Wealth Agenda framework, our analysis positions inclusive CRE as another tool in the wealth innovation toolbelt. This primer and case studies are designed to help stakeholders, particularly investors, understand how these projects democratize ownership, and deliver long-term wealth creation to individuals and communities. The transformative impacts of inclusive CRE are clear, but this strategy needs widespread investment to ensure communities nationwide can participate in and benefit from local commercial developments.
Aspen FSP thanks Prudential Financial and Sorenson Impact Foundation for their generous support of this work.
At Aspen FSP, our Wealth Innovation portfolio identifies and explores wealth-building opportunities spanning employer-provided emergency savings programs, retirement savings, early wealth building accounts, and real estate investment. Advancing the vision put forth in The New Wealth Agenda, our goal is to increase by tenfold the wealth of households of color and those in the bottom half of the wealth distribution in the United States by 2050. The resources below underline the breadth of solutions that, if scaled, have the potential to move beyond merely managing household financial scarcity to creating the conditions of security and well-being that will enable full participation, agency, and dignity in our economy and democracy.
Though Black Americans have experienced greater economic opportunities, many still face wealth loss. This report examines historical events and current trends to develop broad estimates of the amount of Black-owned assets at risk in home equity, retirement savings, and wealth held in businesses they own.
As part of our essential wealth metric project, Aspen FSP has collaborated closely with our partners at Gary Community Ventures to look specifically at the wealth of Coloradans.
This case study from Gary Community Ventures and Aspen FSP explores the design, policy, and financing tools that made the Colorado Tenant Equity Vehicle (TEV) possible.
Aspen FSP Fellow Devin Murphy is committed to growing models of wealth building so that all U.S. families can thrive. Learn more about his work in this Q&A.
Attaining a baseline of security, mobility, and well-being requires wealth. But exactly how much is needed? This brief aims to offer a path toward greater empirical understanding of what constitutes essential wealth and how to measure it.
Households need tools that help them afford everyday life and build long-term security. Too often, policy systems fail to respond to both of these needs and instead prioritize one goal over the other.